Homiletics

The Why Behind The Instruction

/ Peter Mead / Leave a comment

WhyThe Bible contains plenty of instruction.  There are the instructional sections of epistles.  Jesus gave more than a few.  There are the instructions implicit in the wisdom literature.  Then there are obvious implications with built-in instructions when we look at narratives.

So our job is to explain and apply, and the apply part is relatively easy when we are dealing with instruction, right?  Yes and no.  Certainly it is helpful when the text pushes us toward something that will be helpful and relevant to communicate to listeners.  And for the most part, people appreciate being told what is expected of them.  But there is an issue to watch out for . . .

How do we avoid moralizing?  That is, how do we avoid simply turning the Bible into instructions for good clean living?  You may think there is nothing wrong with that, but I beg to differ.  The problem of sin is far more profound than mere ignorance or lack of instruction.  The sin problem facing humanity is far more profound than we tend to recognize, and consequently a lot of sermons don’t even scratch the surface of the issue.  In fact, some actually exacerbate the issue!

How can a sermon make the sin problem worse?  Surely good preaching helps people live less sinful lives?  Good preaching does, but not by moralizing.  Simply pressuring people to clean up their act and perform more like good clean Christians is not gospel work.  It is what Tim Keller refers to as turning younger brothers into older brothers.  Cleaner, supposedly better and certainly more religious, but no more Christian than a fence post.  Behaviour modification is not the intention of the Bible.  Independent pride promotion is the antithesis of Biblical intent.

So am I going against Scripture to argue against moralizing, especially when there is so much instruction there?  I don’t think so.  The Scripture assumes things to which we have grown blind.  Knowing God brings life change, there are instructions relevant for those who are in communion with Him, but the process is never one of behaviour modification first, internal realities second.  And growth as a Christian is not a different set of rules, it continues to be by faith from first to last.  So what does this mean?

In a nutshell, it means that we can’t simply be the older brother patrol out to instruct people toward a pseudo-godliness.  When you preach an instructive section, be sure to put it in its full gospel context.  Specifically, seek to answer the “why?” question.  Why does that command make sense in light of the Bible’s teaching about God and sin and life?  How you answer the why question will reveal your theology.  That you ask the why question will reveal your awareness that instruction alone is never enough.

Quick Answers to Preaching Questions

/ Peter Mead / Leave a comment

logo

Here are a few brief video clips that may be of interest . . .

What is the biggest challenge the preacher faces bringing an ancient text to a contemporary audience?

What are the freedoms and limitations that we have in preaching?

What books would you recommend to preachers?

What are the essential ingredients in expository preaching?

Mixing the Matters

/ Peter Mead / 1 Comment

Proud2You matter.  Preaching matters.  Your preaching matters.  But don’t mix these up.

You matter – you are a person for whom Christ died, a person who has been bought with a price and baptised into the body of Christ to participate in the fellowship and life of God himself.  Just like the people you preach to, your worth and value are to be found in Christ.

Preaching matters – what God has done in Christ for your listeners and you is truly worth sharing boldly and openly.  Preaching matters because God is an incarnationally-minded communicator and as a result, we have something to say.  Preaching the word of God has always been a key part of God’s mission in this world, for there is a revelation and a proclamation at the core of that mission.

Your preaching matters – you may not be so-and-so famous preacher who draws huge crowds, but you are more than just the person scheduled to preach this next time.  The people gathered have a divine appointment with the word of the gospel, so you will want to give your very best for their sake, and for His.  The famous preacher is not scheduled to be there, by God’s providence, you are.

Don’t mix these up – one of the ways we can get into trouble as preachers is to start to confuse these truths.  Since preaching matters, I matter because of my preaching?  Careful!  The moment we confuse our identity in Christ with our role in ministry, we are set for trouble.  I recently heard of a visiting preacher who marred his reputation by his reaction to a circumstance that thwarted his opportunity to preach.  It is good to take your preaching seriously, but never think you are indispensable.  It is good to serve God in preaching, but never let your identity be determined by it.  Your preaching matters, but God can, and does, work apart from your ministry.

Paul Tripp on Law and Grace

/ Peter Mead / Leave a comment

49331I am really enjoying Dangerous Calling by Paul Tripp.  Here’s a paragraph that jumped out at me last night as I read a few pages:

When I hear a sermon that is essentially law-driven, that is, asking the law to do what only the grace of Jesus Christ can accomplish, I am immediately concerned about the preacher.  I immediately wonder about his view of himself, because if he had any self-consciousness about his own weakness and sin, he would find little hope and comfort for himself and his hearers in that kind of sermon.  You see this dynamic in the Pharisees.  Because they thought of themselves as righteous, perfect law givers, they had no problem laying unbearable law burdens on others.  Their misuse of the law had its roots not only in bad theology but also in ugly human pride.  They saw law keeping as possible, because they thought they were keeping it. And they thought that others should get up and keep it as well as they did.  They were the religious leaders of their day, but they were arrogant, insensitive, uncompassionate, and judgmental.  They were not part of what God was doing at the moment; no, they were in the way of it.

If you want more, get the book.  This paragraph is on page 153.

The Fourth Ingredient

/ Peter Mead / Leave a comment

4thIngredientbWhat goes into good preaching?  Many point to a mix of three ingredients that are needed:

Biblically Faithful – The message needs to be the message of the text faithfully interpreted and communicated.

Organizationally & Vocally Clear – The listeners need to be able to hear and follow the train of thought.

Contemporarily Relevant – The listeners need to sense that the message is relevant to their life and circumstance.

If preaching could tick these three boxes on a consistent basis, then the church would be healthier by far.  But all three can be present and the message can still be painfully dull.  Biblical, but dull.  Clear, but dull.  Relevant, but dull.

So when I evaluate preaching, I always include a fourth necessary ingredient: Interpersonally Engaging.  Good preaching needs to be biblical, clear, relevant and engaging.

What goes into engaging?

Engaging content – the content of a message needs to go further than just being biblical and relevant.  It engages by being intriguing, or attractive, or gripping, or vivid.  The narratives of the biblical text or sermonic illustration need to form images on the screens in listeners’ hearts.  The poetry of the text needs to shape images and stirs emotion in the listeners’ hearts.  The content needs to captivate listeners so that they can’t help but want to listen.

Engaging delivery – the delivery of a message needs to go further than just being clear.  I’ve heard clear preaching that sent me quickly to sleep.  Engaging delivery engages through energy – energy appropriate to the situation and personality of the preacher, but energy nonetheless.  Energy is not just about hype and volume.  It is about facial expression, gesture, movement, vocal variety, eye contact.  The delivery, whether big and demonstrative or measured and deliberate, needs to engage the listener in some way.

Motivation to Engage – the key, though, is neither content nor delivery.  The key seems to be at the level of the preacher’s motivation.  If the preacher is prayerfully prepared to the point that they share God’s heart for the listeners and the situation, then they will want to connect.  If they want to connect, then both the content and delivery will tend towards what it should be in order to engage the hearts of those listening.  The real issue here is not technique, but motivation for relationship.  If the preacher is connected to God and wants to connect with the listener, there is a good chance that they will.  And if they do, then there is much greater chance of the preaching being life changing.

Weakening our Legacy by Dangerous Independency

/ Peter Mead / 2 Comments

CorDeo_2013_002bPreachers will always be tempted to function and minister alone.  After all, preaching and pastoring are lonely pursuits for several reasons.  However, if we give in to that temptation, then we will seriously undermine our potential impact in a community.

Today is the last day of this year’s full-time programme at Cor Deo.  It has been such a delight to go shoulder to shoulder with eight other men who are hungry to know God more and love Him together.  We have studied the Bible and theology and practical ministry and personal spirituality.  We have ministered together, traveled  together, laughed together, done life together.  And we are all genuinely sad that this rich season is coming to a close.

So will we settle for ministry from a distance?  Will we be satisfied with lone ranger ministry?  No chance.  These men will be looking for others with a heart for God with whom they can pursue Him in the years to come.  Here are a few brief thoughts on avoiding independency as a preacher:

1. Never forget Jesus view of the crowds and the few: he was willing to lose the crowds, but he valued leaving a deeper mark on fewer people.  The example of Jesus challenges our “bigger is always better” mentality.  After feeding thousands and caring for the crowds, Jesus would spend time explaining to and investing in a small group of men.

2. Mentoring must not be an option for someone involved in ministry.  Actually, even Jesus’ ministry to the crowds would strategically involve those few men.  Don’t view mentoring as a ministry option that may or may not fit you.  Ask God to point out people to whom you can give yourself and your ministry.

3. Don’t fall for worldly-wise ideas about necessary distance and avoiding friendship in leadership –  The only people who find friends threatening are those precariously perched on top of a power pyramid where someone getting close becomes a threat to their position.  Jesus certainly didn’t model ministry from a distance, but he had the twelve, among whom he had the three, among whom he had the one.  As Andy Stanley puts it, do for one what you wish you could do for all.  You can’t give yourself away evenly, so don’t make the mistake of not giving yourself away at all.

4. Pray for a Bible read through partner – could well be the best thing you’ve done in ministry.  The heartbeat of Cor Deo’s success in the lives of the participants this year has again been the Bible read through partnerships.  Simple idea: find someone who will share your ambition to know God more by reading through the Bible boldly and relationally.  Set an end goal (perhaps 3 or 4 months), go for it.  Underline your highlights and meet up once a week to share a few minutes of highlights and pray for each other.  Watch lives get transformed (including your own).  Click here for a better explanation.

5. See through your own busy excuse.  Of course we are all too busy for any of this, but we all find time for what we consider truly valuable.

Losing our Youth by Dangerous Superficiality

/ Peter Mead / 4 Comments

123Last night I was chatting with my eldest about her maths homework.  As I looked at her workbook I recognized that eventually she will be doing things I can no longer do.  For a child there is a progression from basic numeracy, through addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, long division, etc.  I expect most parents can cope with these (except long division!)  But once the child is working through algebra, geometry, trigonometry and calculus, there is typically the crossing of a threshold in respect to what the parent can readily understand.

So what should the parent do at that point?  Hopefully you will start to see the relevance to this site here . . .

1. Become suspicious of the questions and insist that the child go back to basic numeracy.

2. Warn the child of the dangers of sophisticated mathematics and reassert that basic numeracy is all anyone ever needs.

Imagine the child decides they like the subject and wants to chase mathematics to degree level?  Uh oh.

Hang on, this makes no sense.  No parent that I know would function this way.  They would at least cheer the child on, and possibly put some effort in to understanding the subject again or for the first time.

So what do we do in church?  Let’s change the subject from mathematics to Christianity.  There is a progression.  Typically the progression is simple . . . (1) before age 11 tell lots of disconnected stories with a moral sting in the tail, (2) during teenage years speak about issues and hope the youth connect the issues to the disconnected stories, (3) watch them drift away in the sophisticated and heady world of university (if not before).

If a child is progressing to calculus in mathematics, won’t they also be asking very heavy questions in respect to life and faith and eternity?  Too often parents, youth leaders and even preachers, are scared by the good questions.  Too easily church people retreat into such nonsense as, “you shouldn’t ask questions like that, you will offend God!”  or “be careful with your questioning, it could lead you astray!”  And these unhelpful comments are sometimes topped off with thoughts like, “the Bible says it, that settles it, we don’t question it, blindly believe it!”  Throwing the same few proof texts at good questions will not achieve anything good.

Let’s prayerfully question the children’s and youth ministry in our churches.  Let’s prayerfully ponder the preaching in our churches.  Are we losing our younger folk by never engaging them properly?  Simplistic faith formulae may have worked for you, but they probably won’t for the next generation coming through.  If all they see is simplistic “blind faith” and never meet Christians willing to think, to study, to learn, to question, to ponder, to wrestle and to take God seriously, why shouldn’t they be drawn away when they meet a thinking, studying, learning, questioning, pondering, wrestling sophisticated atheist?

Listener Levels: 7 Ways to Add Steak to the Diet

/ Peter Mead / 3 Comments

MeasuringTapeWhat if your biblical explanation is typically at a level lower than many of your listeners?  What are some suggestions for adding steak to the diet of listeners that are needing it?

1. Pray – Nobody cares about your listeners as much as God, so ask for His coaching.

2. Get feedback – It would be better to know what people think than assume they are needing weightier content.  For instance, just because there are seminary professors in your congregation doesn’t mean they want to be “stretched” by your preaching.  Good, solid, biblical and faithful preaching that is clear and applicable may be the highlight of their week!

3. Watch and evaluate some great explainers – Watch a preacher who is especially effective at biblical exposition.  What is it about their preaching that makes it effective?  (You may find they are simpler than you at first imagined . . . our tendency is to think more info, higher vocab and greater complexity is the key to steaky preaching – not so.)

4. Make connections carefully – It doesn’t take any skill to string biblical proof-texts together.  There is no licensing for tour guides in the “concordance safari” industry.  It does take great biblical awareness to be able to make the links that are appropriate to a message.  For instance, learn to look back in the canon and see what is feeding in to the passage (Kaiser’s “Informing Theology”).  Learn to value other writing by the same author slightly higher than other writings.  This is not as simple as a set of rules, it is an art form.

5. Devour your Bible as if God is worth knowing – To be able to help people make sense of biblical texts, there is no substitute for personal biblical saturation.  I’d rather be fed by someone who really knows their Bible than someone who has crammed higher level commentary content in the last days of preparation.  (This is not to deny the value of good commentary conversations.)

6. Well-cooked steak is seldom complex – I remember hearing radio ads for a steakhouse in Portland.  I was in seminary so could never afford to go there, but it did sound good.  What did I expect of a $75 steak?  Not lots of extra ingredients and spice overload combined with complex cooking processes.  I expected better quality content prepared simply.  Same with preaching.  When we think about preaching more steaky messages, we tend to crank up the jargon and lose sight of our message purpose.  Don’t.  Take the time to have better content, but don’t complicate, in fact, simplify sermon structure, etc.

7. The best “theology” is not on the cutting edge of speculation, it is pushing into the big and core questions – Don’t think that steaky biblical explanation comes from speculative originality, whether that be in sensational eschatology, or obscure theological novelty (save that for your PhD).  The best steaky biblical explanation comes from showing how the biblical text drives us back to the core questions: who is God and what is He like?  What does it mean to be human and made in His image?  What is sin and how deep is the problem?  What is grace and how does God solve the problem of sin in salvation and Christian growth?  God, man, sin, grace and growth.  Simple stuff, but if you can let the Bible probe these issues, your steak will be truly life changing.

Listener Levels: 7 Suggestions to Improve Accessibility

/ Peter Mead / Leave a comment

MeasuringTapeHow can we improve at offering explanation that will help people at the lower range of understanding?  Perhaps your preaching goes over peoples’ heads, but you want to explain the Bible in a way that is accessible to younger Christians or less biblically literate folk?  Some suggestions:

1. Pray about it – Nobody cares about your listeners as much as God, so ask for His coaching.

2. Get feedback – Try to find out from people what is lacking.  It could be that your vocabulary is obfuscatory, or your content is too dense, or your delivery is unengaging, or your words are indistinct and hard to catch, etc.

3. Watch and evaluate some great explainers – Watch a preacher who is especially effective at explaining and describing the biblical content and action.  What are they doing well?

4. Vary the elevation of your helicopter – If everything is explained from 100ft, then your messages will be deadening.  You need to be able to lift up to 5000ft for a brief overview of the Bible, and you need to be able to land the chopper when you are settling for a while in a verse.  Too much content where you need to be flying higher will lose listeners in overwhelming detail.

5. Surrender prideful vocabulary – To put it simply: your mission is not to impress, but to communicate.  Relegate your original language vocabulary, your technical grammatical vocabulary, your systematic theological terminology and any other impressive jargon to your study.  Know it, understand it, and sometimes, if necessary, explain it, but generally speaking it is best to leave it behind when you go to preach.

6. Achieve more by preaching less and driving it in more – Speaking of leaving things in the study, try leaving more of your message there.  Often we confuse people by trying to achieve too much education in a single sermon.  Andy Stanley says that many sermons would make great series.  Try to cover less and you will have time for clearer explanation.

7. Improve your outlining – A lot of messages are complex because the preacher hasn’t thought themselves through to a point of clarity.  I typically point to the main idea at this point, since a clear main idea will create clarity throughout the message.  So true.  But also give some time to evaluating the outline.  Is it as simple and clear as can be?  Is each part of the message doing something specific?  If at a certain point in your message you don’t even know that you are trying to explain, nor will your listeners!

What else would you add?