Receiving feedback on your ministry is so important. Anyone unwilling to receive feedback is self-identifying as proud and out of their depth. However, not all feedback is created equal. Let us learn to discern the difference between feedback that is low value, and feedback that is high value.
Before we get to three ingredients of high value feedback, let’s first consider four types of low value feedback. When I call it low value, I don’t mean to suggest it has no value. Everything anyone says to us has value because they do, but we need to be discerning. In fact, here are four types of low value feedback followed by one guiding principle to help us be good stewards of that feedback.
Here are four types of feedback that allow us to value the giver of the feedback, but perhaps we should be careful not to over-treasure the comments themselves:
1. The polite comment – when you preach to a group of people and then stand at the door to shake hands as they leave (a common custom in many churches), then people feel somewhat obligated to express something to you as they pass. For some a smile and friendly greeting will feel natural, while for others they will feel obligated to offer a polite expression of gratitude. This is kind and should be appreciated for the loving gesture it is, but it is rarely feedback that should mark the future of your ministry!
2. The extreme comment – while the majority are adept at the polite non-comment, some people have a tendency to drift to one extreme or another. One may tell you that your message was the best message ever preached in your language, while another may be happy to label you a heretic worthy of stoning to death. There may be some truth in either extreme, but probably without the extreme intensity of the comment. Again, appreciate the person, but be careful with the comment.
3. The no comment – after preaching, teaching, leading, or serving in whatever way, we tend to feel somewhat drained. Sometimes the feedback that screams loudest is the silence in the aftermath. Some will chat about anything but what you have done and said, while it may feel that others are apparently avoiding interaction. You can go home feeling very discouraged. This may not be an accurate reading of the situation. I recently preached a sermon and received essentially a friendly silence on the day. Two days later several positive comments came during home group. I would have been wrong to assume that the silence on the day was an indictment from all who heard, but it is so easy to feel that way.
4. The misunderstandable comment – when people have to say something, they sometimes veil their comments. I have watched preachers get excited by feedback that was actually not positive. For example, “that was so deep” often means that you went over their heads. Or “thanks for your hard work preparing” may be avoiding a reference to the fruit of that preparation. Maybe a “you certainly put a new spin on things!” might be pointing out borderline heresy. And “what a feast of Scripture” may well mean you cross-referenced your audience into submission. Don’t look for a hidden meaning in everything that you hear, but equally don’t build a ministry on a collection of ambiguous feedback.
So what is the guiding principle I mentioned above? How should we handle these kinds of feedback that we may suspect are not that valuable in respect to shaping our future ministry? When you receive feedback make sure that instead of letting praise go to your head or criticism to your heart, first take it all to the throne. You can express gratitude and care for anyone that expresses anything to you about your ministry. But then take it to God. He is able to protect you from pride, and to guard you from despair. He is able to filter what you have heard and, by His Spirit, hand back that which should make a difference to your ministry. There is always something to learn, but there is also always a need for God’s help in handling all that comes (or doesn’t come) your way.
This may sound like a criticism of all comments people might make. I do not mean it to be that. I thank God for the kindness of people to offer gratitude, and to offer constructive feedback (and I can even thank God for his kindness when some have been brutal in their assessments, even if I didn’t feel it at the time!)
Here are three ingredients that tend to flag up more valuable feedback. When one or more of these ingredients is present, then you can be confident that what you have heard is going to be useful (still take it to the throne first, of course!)
1. Time. When someone comes to you with a comment or with gratitude and some time has passed, this is a flag that you are hearing something that should register. Perhaps it is a few days, or a week or two. Maybe someone tells you about something you said or did over a decade ago. When time is an ingredient, then the feedback has a special value and should not be ignored or brushed off.
2. Thought. When someone puts thought into offering gratitude, feedback or even constructive criticism, then recognize that you are likely to have something to treasure here. Maybe they took the time to write a note, or maybe they have obviously thought ahead about what they want to say to you. This is not off-the-cuff comment, but thought through and careful communication. Don’t miss it, it is probably worth your time to ponder it before God.
3. Insight. When someone has not just thought about what they want to say, but show an insight into what you said or did, then you have valuable feedback. Sometimes people are quick to appreciate an illustration that made them laugh – great, be thankful for positive response, but when someone sees what you were saying and takes it forward an extra step, or applies it in an appropriate direction you hadn’t considered, then you have something to be valued.
When we stand in front of people to preach, to teach, or to lead, then comments will come our way. Let’s pray for grace to always value the person more than the comment, discernment in evaluating how much that comment should mark our ministry, humility to guard against sabotage by praise, and resilience to withstand attacks not designed to help us, but rather to do damage. Words can do so much, but let’s ask God to help us distinguish what is truly helpful in the midst of so much talk.
3 thoughts on “Feedback: Best Friend or Worst Enemy?”
Thanks Peter for these insights (for once I take time to comment on your posts, but that doesn’t mean I don’t value the others!); having preached yesterday its timely and I can easily relate to what you say. I’ll have to remember to bring the feedbacks to the throne first, as I tend to doubt the positive ones and believe the negative ones…
Peter, thanks for years of keeping this helpful site going. Question: have you come across a helpful review form for evaluation and feedback that you could share? Any tips for how to regularly collect feedback from the audience in a discrete yet effective way?
Thanks David. Honestly I find the most useful evaluation form to be a quadrant that asks for input on these four things: Biblical, Clear, Engaging and Relevant? That helps me get the feedback in line with my goals as a preacher. I find more specific forms that ask about introduction, conclusion etc tend to create an expectation on the shape of the sermon that I don’t want to feel constrained by. However, getting feedback from listeners depends on their awareness of preaching. For instance, a fellow elder can give feedback on all four areas, whereas a young Christian might be asked simply to evaluate clarity, or when they felt engaged or disengaged by the sermon. Asking one question tends to get better feedback from most people. In our church we as leaders try to evaluate each others messages fairly often (probably not as much as we should, but we do give input regularly).