What If?

Thankfully most churches do not descend into the superficiality of contemporary TV games shows.  Now I would be highly relevant and refer to one, but I don’t watch any, so I’ll have to be slightly generic.  Imagine for a moment that your church instituted a new slot in the church service. . .

Each week two preachers take turns to give the opening five minutes of their sermon.  Then the audience get to vote for which sermon they get to hear that day.  Perhaps the losing introduction gets less travel expenses.  Perhaps the church could install a praise-o-meter and the selection could be made via volume of singing in two subsequent songs.  Ok, enough of that.

Thankfully most churches don’t descend to such a level.  We have a bit more of an appropriate atmosphere and ethos around the worship time and the sermon.  Or do we?

Even without the flashing lights of the praise-o-meter, or the host with his “able assistant,” or the hype of a vote, something similar does happen each week.  At the end of the introduction, each listener chooses whether they will engage or disengage for the rest of the message.  Few, if any, will leave.  But many may leave internally, heading for the golf course, or the weekly to-do list, or the forthcoming interview, or whatever.  In fact, by the end of the introduction, many leavers will already be long gone.  The first moments and minutes of a message are so vital!

Preaching is no game.  But let’s not neglect the importance of arresting attention, surfacing a need, engaging the listener, demonstrating earliest possible relevance of speaker, text and message.  Don’t depend on their dutiful commitment to listen to the Word.  Win them so they can’t help themselves!

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Advertisements

One thought on “What If?

  1. Thanks for this simple thought. It has impacted my sermon preparation greatly this week.

    I tend to gravitate toward the ditch that says, if I’ve got the “meat” of the sermon ready to go, the argument, the exposition, then I’m pretty much done. I easily forget that a poorly crafted Conclusion can make the whole sermon weak and ineffective, even if my argument was stellar.

    And, as in this post, when I give no attention to the introduction, I miss out on the chance to grab the listener by the shirt collar and make him want to listen to the argument.

    I’m really starting to see that the intro and the conclusion are the segments of the sermon where I need to get my creative juices flowing, for the sake of creating (or rather illuminating) drama and tension, and driving application home. On the other hand, the argument is the place where my own urge to be “creative” is not so helpful: much better to be simple and basic there.

    So, this Friday morning, it is still the introduction that is giving me fits.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s