The Ministry of Saying Less

September 1, 2026August 26, 2026 / Peter Mead / Leave a comment

In preaching, teaching, counselling, and leadership, there is something to be said for saying less. I am not suggesting that we become aloof and mysterious. But there is a danger that we can say so much that people start to miss what they most need to hear.

Saying too much is a danger for people who are new to their role. A young preacher will tend to feel insecure and assume that they have to prove the value and depth of their study by sharing everything they learned during preparation. A new leader can feel tempted to speak because they are the leader and hope the many words will prove their wisdom.

But this can also be a danger for experienced folks too. It takes work to evaluate material, cut content, and sharpen a presentation. Sometimes, as we get older, we can lose the energy and discipline needed to filter a good message into a better one.

Whether it is insecurity, laziness, or another reason, there is a danger that we say more than we should and the listeners miss the part they needed to hear.

Good preaching, teaching, leading, and counselling require not only knowing what to say, but knowing what not to say. Cutting material is not an admission of weakness; it can be an act of love toward the listeners and good stewardship before God.

Tempted to say everything

In ministry, you will often have a lot to say. A lot of accumulated knowledge, a lot of research for a message, a lot of ideas and stories that you could share. In fact, when you prepare to preach a sermon, you should have more material than can fit into the message – a good message never comes from working until you have enough to fill the time. To really study a passage will mean gaining contextual awareness, textual detail, geographical insight, theological connections, relevant cross-references, and a host of potential applications. It is tempting to try to say everything, in part, because everything you learned was a blessing to you.

Good things can be distracting

Perhaps you prepared prayerfully and studiously for a counselling meeting with a person in your church. In counselling, you have the added dimension of needing to listen and direct the conversation in a helpful direction. But still, you have a big stock of ideas, suggestions, stories, and teaching you might choose to share. Whether it is a sermon, a counselling session, or another ministry setting, you need to be selective in what you share. The hardest things to cut will be good things: a useful illustration, a memorable story, an interesting historical detail, a relevant theological insight, a surprising cross-reference. It is not enough to ask, ‘is it true?’ We need to ask, does this really serve the central goal of this ministry opportunity?

Saying less can make the main thing clearer

Let’s imagine having a hundred potential items to include. Every one of them, if included, will compete for attention. People cannot process a hundred thoughts, ideas, stories, and pieces of information. Think of the familiar bed-of-nails demonstration. A single nail can be dangerous, but spread the weight across hundreds of nails and the pressure is distributed. Something similar happens with communication: when we scatter people’s attention across a hundred thoughts, none of them receives much weight. So it is with our presentation: don’t press people with a hundred thoughts; penetrate with a sharpened point. If everything is said, nothing is particularly heard. If everything is emphasized, nothing is emphasized. Work to remove whatever does not belong, then subordinate some of your material so it supports and reinforces the main thing you want to make clear.

Cutting material requires humility, love, and effort

Sometimes we may be tempted to keep something because it demonstrates our preparation. But “I worked hard on this” is not a reason to make people hear it. Some of your best research will be left in your study. It takes humility not to prove your effort or knowledge. It takes love to prayerfully hone your material for the best impact on your listeners. It takes effort to go through the message again, sharpen it one more time, and work on individual points until they are as clear as they can be.

What should make it through the cutting process?

If a particular passage is the focus of this moment of ministry, then the main truth of that passage should make it through the cutting process. The unique impact of that passage may not be considered again for years, so you don’t want to miss the moment now. What helps people understand that truth? What helps them feel its weight? What helps them to respond appropriately? And even ministry that isn’t offered under the label of a single passage, such as a counselling session or a leadership presentation, will benefit from similar clarity and focus.

We are not called to prove our competence, show off our knowledge, or justify our efforts in preparation. We are called to serve. Put in the work to build up too much material, then put in the work to hone it down for maximum impact. The ministry of saying less isn’t about having less to say. It is about caring enough to decide what most needs to be said. We don’t need to sound like a mysterious guru. Let’s try to be as on target as we can be. Less noise, more impact. Because sometimes the most pastorally loving thing we can say is less than others might expect. After all, the goal is not for people to hear us, but by God’s grace, through us, to hear Him.

_____________________________________________

Definition Matters – 7 Pro-Am Preaching Points

December 16, 2022 / Peter Mead / Leave a comment

Definition matters massively. One person might say, “professional preachers are the problem!” Then another person might say, “amateur preachers are the problem!” And both might be right. It all depends on what they mean by what they say.

1. “Professional” can be referring to very different issues. What image does the term “professional” bring to mind? You might think of a person’s skill, or how they handle their communications with customers, or their manner in person, or their motivation for what they do. That is already four variations of potential meaning for the term “professional.” Perhaps an electrician is called to solve a problem in your house. They might be a real professional in their work (positive – they knew exactly what to do), their invoice was very professional looking (positive – good communications), their conversation and manner in conversation might have been a bit professional (negative – cold or aloof communications), and their reason for working may have seemed too professional (negative – it was all about the money).

2. “Amateur” can be referring to very different issues, too. What image does the term “amateur” bring to mind? You might think in the same categories as before. Perhaps the electrician was amateur in their work (negative – they did not know what to do), their invoice looked very amateur (negative – sloppy communication), their conversation might convey the enthusiasm of an amateur (positive – they love what they do), and their reason for work may have been the best side of an amateur (positive – they do it for the love of their craft).

3. In terms of skill, be professional. I don’t want someone showing “amateurish” skill levels when they fix my car, cut my hair, or operate on me. Skill is good. In reality, some of the most skilled people in the world may not be paid for what they do, while some who are paid should not be allowed anywhere near your car, your scalp or a scalpel. So actually, pay is irrelevant. The point is about skill. So as a preacher, it does not matter to this point whether you are paid to preach or not. In terms of skill, be as professional as possible. Read, learn, study, grow. Be a good steward of the ministry opportunity God has given you.

4. In respect to motivation, be amateur. When someone’s vocation has been “professionalised” then their motivation becomes suspect. This is why a nationally known car exhaust company may not be trusted (did they do more work than was needed in order to get more of my money?) Or why it is a problem if your medical practitioner is incentivized by drug companies to prescribe treatments to as many people as possible (whether they need the treatment or not!) In this respect, skill is not the issue. The point is about motivation. A highly skilled mechanic who rips off the customer is not to be celebrated. A brilliant clinician who risks lives to increase their income should be prosecuted. So as a preacher, your skill level (in this point) is not my concern. In terms of motivation, be as amateur as possible. Love God, love people, and love your craft. Be driven by the privilege of getting to speak God’s Word to people for their benefit.

5. And in the area of interpersonal communication, be genuine. I have underlined issues of skill and motivation, but interpersonal communication is also part of the package. Coming across as too professional can be problematic, even when you are not preaching. Coming across as an amateur might be an issue too. Instead, how about we settle on the need to be genuine? It does not resolve all the complexity of conversational dynamics, but it does leave us with two clear points to finish.

6. As a preacher, let’s do what we do as well as we can. If that means being professional in some sense, so be it. We certainly don’t want to be amateurish.

7. As a preacher, let’s do what we do with heartfelt motivation. If that means being amateurs in some sense, so be it. We certainly don’t want to be professionalised.

The definition of labels is important. This is an example worth pondering as far as preaching is concerned and how we might view our ministry. We should preach as professionals in the sense of “to the best of our ability” and as amateurs in the sense of “with the passion of a captured heart.” We should not preach as professionals in the sense of “relying on our own ability,” or “just for money,” nor as amateurs in the sense of “to a poor standard.”

It is also an example to keep in mind in a world where labels so easily get applied as a pejorative, and the mud sticks because people don’t question what is really meant.

______________________________________

In the next week or so I will be completing my short video collection through the Psalms. Please do check it out and share with any who may find it helpful as a reference, or better yet, as a companion through the Psalms in 2023!

Preaching Myths – Part 2

January 4, 2018January 2, 2018 / Peter Mead / Leave a comment

Last time we thought about the idea that godly preparation precludes the possibility of evaluation. This time let’s take an idea that is related to that:

2. If it bears good fruit then it is a good sermon.

This is a good follow up to the previous myth. Maybe you’ve had the experience of struggling through a sermon only to discover that someone else loved it. Fair enough, there is certainly subjectivity involved in hearing a message. But what about when the sermon you hear is not just not to your taste, but actually contains error, and then … someone trusts in Christ at the end. That can be perplexing!

So many things need to be taken into account here. You could have misheard the preacher. You could have been biased in your critical view of the message. Your evaluation criteria may be completely off. At the same time, the fruit that seems so surprising could be the fruit of other ministry rather than this particular message. Or the fruit could not be genuine. Or the fruit could be the glorious grace of God working despite a weak or flawed sermon (praise God for that if you are a preacher, you’ve probably preached some shockers too!) There are so many unknowns in this.

However, accepting all the multiple layers of complexity, there seems to be a double-edged bottom line here. On the one hand ministry will be judged by its fruits and this is right. Good, faithful, Christ-centred, biblically-driven, Spirit-dependent ministry will bring genuine and eternity-changing fruit over the course of time. On the other hand, there is not a one-for-one correspondence here: apparently positive fruit (conversions, feedback, etc.) does not mean this particular sermon was solid, neither does apparently negative fruit (no response, negative feedback, etc.) mean this particular sermon fell short. God does a lot of unseen work through messages while preachers press on in faith without knowing if it is making the slightest bit of difference.

How have you experienced this tension?

Biggest Mistakes Preachers Make

February 9, 2015 / Peter Mead / 1 Comment

This week I want to share some of the biggest mistakes preachers make. Actually, these are the biggest mistakes I have probably made. Perhaps this can help others pondering the wonderful privilege of preaching the Bible!

Mistake 1 – Simply Harvesting Imperatives

It feels easy, and it feels right, to turn proclamation into imperative presentation. All you have to do is present the text and then make sure people know the imperatives: the “must do” or “should do” or “best do” of the passage. Whether or not there is technically an imperative in the text, we so easily turn a passage into mere instruction and press for change as we preach.

Sidebar: Introducing the Imperative

The mood is one of several features of a verb. In Greek, for instance, there are four moods: indicative, subjunctive, optative and imperative. The mood presents the verbal action or state with regards to the verb’s actuality or potentiality. The imperative mood is concerned with intention. Thus the most common use of the imperative is to express a command. However, it would be wrong to collapse imperative into commands (or assume all commands are imperative). An imperative can be used to forbid an action (prohibition), to express a request (such as in prayer), a sense of resignation, a pronouncement, a condition, or even just a greeting. So? Simply identifying and harvesting imperatives is not a shortcut to an instructional/applied sermon!

Remember the Context – Typically the epistles will offer lists of instructions, but never in isolation. The chapter breaks and section headings may segregate a set of instructions or commands, but the letters were written as a coherent whole. We are to present our bodies as living sacrifices . . . in view of God’s mercies. We are to walk in a manner worthy . . . of the calling we have received. We are to set our hearts on things above, where Christ is . . . the Christ presented in the first half of Colossians!

Remember the Mechanism – As long as we think lives are transformed by the pressure we can apply in our preaching, our ministry will be desperately restricted. Lives are transformed by pointing the gaze of listeners’ hearts toward Christ. In Christ, in Christ, in Christ . . . so walk worthy. The captivating truth of what God has done in Christ is preached, the Spirit works in the heart, an appetite to please God comes forth like sap in a fruit tree, and the instructions are there to guide the growth.

Forget the Short-Cut – It feels like a short-cut: just find imperatives, or turn some content into imperative, and then pressure people. You will even get encouraging feedback (the flesh loves this stuff!) But you won’t see much true, genuine, abundant growth. Forget the short-cut and preach the text, in context, pointing to the God it reveals, and the growth may be imperceptible (good fruit growth isn’t instant), but it will be definite, genuine, multiplying, healthy, Christ-honoring, loving, joyful, peaceful, etc., fruitful growth!

The Four Places of Preaching

June 5, 2012June 6, 2012 / Peter Mead / Leave a comment

There is a journey from text to message. A journey consists of a sequence of locations, so I’d like to lay out the four places of preaching. Perhaps this will be helpful to someone.

Place 1 – The Study

The first place the preacher needs to go is the study. Just the preacher, the Bible, perhaps a desk, whatever study resources may be available, and a prayerful pursuit of the meaning of the text.

What is the goal in this place? To be able to accurately state the main idea of the passage in a single sentence summary as a result of prayerful historical, grammatical, literary study of the passage in its context, with a heart laid bare before God.

Who is involved? This place is where the preacher is in prayerful pursuit of the meaning of the passage. So there is a historical focus, a sense in which the preacher is seeking to go back then to the time when the human author wrote the passage. There is a deep concern with making sense of the text as it was intended, as inspired, with the historical and written context, the inspired choice of genre, the content of the passage in terms of its details and its structure or flow, and the intent of the writer.

So the preacher is studying, exegeting, interpreting. Yet in that quiet place of wrestling with the text, the text is also wrestling with the preacher. This is not some sort of abstract and entirely objective study. The preacher is there. When the Bible speaks, God speaks, and when God speaks, lives change. So the preacher has the privilege of being marked by the text as the Spirit of God first applies the passage to the life of the preacher.

The study is a place of deep fellowship between the preacher and God.

Why, then, the study? Should this not be the library, after all, studying involves resources? No, this should be a study, because a library is a place of people pursuing information for a variety of purposes. The preacher’s study is a place where the preacher meets with God as the biblical text is studied both exegetically and profoundly devotionally.

Should this not be the office, after all, ministry is a complex business these days? No, this should be a study (whatever the room actually is), because an office is a place of action and interaction, of incoming emails and phone calls, a place where multiple plates are kept spinning. No great and profound preaching can come out of an office. (If your study is too much of an office, then study elsewhere – borrow a room and leave your phone behind, study in your car in the woods, but go somewhere where you can be with the Lord in a “study”.)

Tomorrow, place 2 . . .