Layers of Complexity

Sometimes a passage may prove more complex than it initially appears.  This is almost always the case with stories in the Gospels.  Usually Christians tend to view each story as a distinct unit that can be pulled out from the context in which it is placed.  In reality, each story or account in a Gospel is carefully woven together with others for a purpose.  For example, the stilling of the storm in Mark 4 is placed after, and linked to, the first part of the chapter where Jesus is teaching about the kingdom using parables.  However, in Matthew the account is in a series of miracle stories, quite separate from those same parables (which appear later).  While someone might suggest this indicates that what comes before and after is irrelevant to the interpretation of the passage, in fact the opposite is true.  The stories themselves, just like words, seem to get their meaning not only from within themselves, but also from the company they keep.

So while a story may appear simple to understand, as you study it in its context you often find that considering it in its context will clarify its meaning and purpose.  Then as you consider the context and flow of thought more, the interpretation may become more involved and complex.  As a preacher your first priority is to do everything you can to understand the passage. 

Once you’ve done all that you can to understand the passage, you then have to form the sermon.  The temptation will be to dump every element of your study into the sermon.  Don’t.  What is necessary and helpful?  What must be explained, what can simply be stated, what parts of your presentation need proof?  How much time do you have to support what you say?  Sometimes you will discover that your understanding of a passage has multiple layers of complexity, stretching out through layer after layer of other stories and accounts within the gospel.  Be thankful for the back-up support you have, but only give as much as is necessary and as much as your listeners can handle.  They may be fine with one layer of context, but overwhelmed if you present five layers.  Know the passage fully, but also know what your listeners need and are able to take onboard!

How Do Ideas Develop?

If communication is all about ideas, which it is, then what happens to those ideas? Haddon Robinson regularly states that there are only three things that you can do to develop an idea. You can explain it. You can prove it. Or you can apply it. There is nothing else that can be done to develop an idea.

* In a biblical passage, what is the author doing? Is he explaining/clarifying, is he proving/convincing, or is he applying/exhorting? It is helpful in Bible study to discern what the author is actually doing as his thought develops.

* As you preach the passage, what does your audience need? Do they need explanation? Do they need to be convinced? Do they need to consider application?

* You do not have to do just what the passage does. It could be that a passage spends no time explaining a concept, but your listeners need that extra explanation. We must know our listeners and their needs as well as possible in order to communicate effectively.

* There is a logical progression to the three developmental options. Generally explanation precedes proof/convincing, and both proceed application. The progression is important to note, even though this does not require us to therefore be rigid in our preaching. We do not need to always follow a formula of stating, explaining, proving, applying, etc. This can be both tedious and unnecessary. But it is important to understand the three options, and to think through what is necessary at each stage of each sermon.

Review: Power in the Pulpit, by Jerry Vines & Jim Shaddix

Subtitle: How to Prepare and Deliver Expository Sermons

vinesshaddix.jpg

Power in the Pulpit is a lengthy three-section textbook.  At times it may feel like the goal in writing was exhaustive explanation, rather than reasonable length.  Although not in the same league as Robinson or Sunukjian, the book is worth reading.  It is especially targeted at the minister preaching every Sunday.

The first section deals with the preparation for exposition.  The task of preaching is defined with a lengthy support for exposition as the ideal philosophy of preaching.  The foundation for preaching is seen in the word of God and worship of God, fundamental pre-requisites for preaching, along with the less well supported concepts of the call of God and anointing.  Finally, the preparation of the preacher is set out through the idea of being a healthy, hard-working individual who is a good steward of heart, mind, body and schedule. 

The second section is somewhat unsatisfying.  The process of exposition is set out at length, but seemingly without original contribution.  The analysis of the text is presented well, followed by the process of theme unification.  In fact, the sections on the central idea, the proposition and the purpose, are all effective (albeit tedious at points).  There is a bombastic attack on the new homiletic when the structure section begins (this makes the book read like a college text rather than a seminary text – proving a point cheaply using straw men, rather than engaging fairly with different views).  Then the structure section gets into concepts like the keyword method.  This section begins well but seems to get weighed down in detail and dogmatism by this stage. 

The writers rightly urge the preacher to be not only biblical, but also relevant.  So the preacher should observe culture and learn about people, they should particularly be concerned with how the message is relevant to their specific audience.  The section ends with strength as the authors provide helpful discussion of invitations at the end of messages (detail often overlooked in preaching texts).

The third part of the book deals with the presentation of the message.  After development comes delivery.  Here the book comes into its own with detailed suggestions on how to communicate the thoughts of the message in a way that will engage and communicate with the audience.  Here audience awareness is critical –level of education, type of vocabulary, manner of delivery and so on.  In order to make the connection necessary with the audience, it is helpful to use visualization for the sake of more vivid communication.  Part of this is visualization of the audience.  Thus, the preacher who better knows his audience will be better prepared.

The book ends with a strong call for preaching from the heart.  It is this personal connection, delivery of passion, of soul, of self, that magnifies the effect of communication on the recipients.  Helpful appendices at the end deal with relaxation, breathing and voice.

This book certainly covers a lot of ground.  Perhaps its greatest strength comes in its exhaustive dealing with delivery.  It is certain chapters, such as on the voice, that will prove a useful resource. 

Lack of Application? Not Just A Pulpit Problem.

A follow-up thought to yesterday’s post. The difference between a true expository sermon and an interesting biblical lecture is often the speaker’s awareness of sermonic purpose. As Bryan Chappell wrote (Christ-Centered Preaching, p52) “Without the ‘so what?’ we preach to a ‘who cares?’” In his own way Haddon Robinson has put it like this, “Preaching can be like delivering a baby, or like delivering a missile – in one your goal is to just get it out, but in the other your goal is to hit the target!”

Perhaps the problem goes deeper though. While it is true that we must think through the purpose for a sermon before preaching it, there seems to be an issue at an earlier stage in the process. Are we saying that it is possible to study a passage, but not follow through and consider its application? Hermeneutical purists argue about whether application is a part of the hermeneutical process. Yet as preachers our concern is not academic wrangling, but bringing the Word of God into the lives of His people, by the power of His Spirit, to see His purposes worked out. May we never fall into the trap of studying a passage, determining the author’s intended meaning, but failing to consider the contemporary application of that passage in our own lives.

Perhaps a lack of application in the pulpit is the fruit of a lack of application in personal study. The implications are frightening.

Expository Preaching is More Than a Commentary

In Christ-Centered Preaching (p55), Bryan Chappell makes the following distinction:

“Expository preaching is not a captioned survey of a passage. By this I mean the typical: ‘1. Saul’s Contention, 2. Saul’s Conversion, 3. Saul’s Commission’ (Acts 9:1-19). In my own circles I think I have heard more sermons of this type than any other. They sound very biblical because they are based on a passage of Scripture. But their basic failure is that they tend to be descriptive rather than pastoral. They lack a clear goal or practical application. The congregation may be left without any true insights as to what the passage is really about, and without having received any clear teaching about God or themselves.”

He is so right. My circles also yield many messages of this type. If you look at tomorrow’s notes and discover you have a message like this, what can you do? Well, with just 24 hours to go, probably not too much. Try to change the points from captions to full sentences that state the idea of that section. Try to change those sentences from historical statements to contemporary applicational points. Or just preach what you have and pray for God to use it anyway.

However, before you start next week’s message, there are things you can do. First of all, remember that your goal is not to present a vocal commentary, but a message where God’s Word is vital and relevant to the lives of your listeners. Take the time to evaluate the listeners as well as the passage. Make clear notes for yourself on the purpose of your message. Seek to integrate relevance and application throughout the message, not only at the level of “illustrations,” but right in the points themselves. Make the points full sentences. Preach to transform lives, trusting the Holy Spirit to do the transforming, but not “despite” your message.

Repent of the faulty idea that merely getting biblical information into peoples’ heads, perhaps with a brief vague application in the conclusion, is enough. To preach an expository message, seek to bring the truth of the Word and the lives of your listeners into an encounter. It is about real life, not vague application. It is about the heart, not just the head.

Review: It’s All in How You Tell It, by Haddon and Torrey Robinson

Subtitle: Preaching First-Person Expository Messages.

rob1stpers.jpg

This book, by Robinson and son, has a clear target. The sleek and well prepared script of the book flies effortlessly to hit that target. Unhindered by extraneous information, disconnected asides or time-consuming tangents, the book achieves its purpose. Preaching first-person expository messages.

The first major thrust of the book is to convince the reader of the efficacy of first-person preaching. Like a stealth bomber that flies in undetected by the defensive radar systems of modern believers, this kind of message can hit the heart like no other. By thinking through the audience and strategically designing the message, the preacher may be more effective using sanctified stealth than throwing traditional telegraphed torpedoes at them. People love a story. God’s Word is overflowing with them. So why do we tend to dissect a story and make it a lecture, leaking power at every stage in the process?

The book goes on to describe the process. Since this is expository preaching, it begins with massive amounts of study – of the text, of the character, of the setting. A key decision is what stance the character should use in light of the text and the audience. Are they with us, are we with them, do they know the listeners are there, etc? Then comes the well-worked big idea, definition of clear purpose, followed by structure, flow and the meat on the bones of the message. The process of preparing a first-person message is described essentially as a simplified Robinson process, with the additional step of character stance. The purpose of a message is not to perform (preacher-centered), but to effectively bring the big idea of a text home to the hearts and lives of the specific listeners that will hear it (Bible and audience centered).

There is a helpful section dealing with specific aspects of delivery such as movement, delivery, costume and so on. Obvious hindrances are overcome in the final chapter. One important lesson brought out in this section deals with the issue of sanctified imagination. As a preacher it is possible to easily assume people can tell the difference between fact and added detail. Assumptions are dangerous. A colorful illustrative detail can be misleading for an unaware audience.

The book ends with seven example sermons showing different approaches, different character stances and so on. Both Matthewson’s and Edward’s, as well as the Robinsons’ Herod sermons left an impression, even just in print. I would have liked to experience the effect of these sermons in person.

This book will leave you with one question. Why don’t you use first-person preaching more often?

And When You Think You Know Them . . .

As a preacher it is important to know who you are preaching to.  This takes work.  Often the focus of this work is on building relationships and getting into their world.  Conversations are priceless, counseling matters much, visiting homes and workplaces is all helpful, reading what they read, and entering into their world.  However, sometimes it is helpful to create an opportunity for them to enter your world.  Specifically I am referring to pre-sermon interaction with some of your congregation.  This could take the form of a sermon group that you meet with regularly.  I know some preachers who do this and value it highly.  Even without taking that step, it is possible to benefit from a one-off meeting.

Last year I preached a single message on the subject of euthanasia.  I invited a group of about ten people to come together to discuss the subject in the week before I preached it.  That meeting was very enlightening and critical in my preparation.  The discussion was not primarily concerned with my learning about the subject, but my learning about how people think of the subject.  I wanted their input on how the message could be handled effectively.

I had my pre-conceived commitment to sensitivity reinforced by the real-life experiences of those in the group.  My sensitive approach would now be more personal.  However, I had my pre-conceived ideas of Christian convictions shattered by the discussion.  After that evening I had to rework significant elements of the message.  The over-riding sense from some of the group was a view typical in this culture, that it is not possible to be caring for people and strong on the issue at the same time.  Therefore, in order to be sensitive, I should not take a strong stance on the issue.  That misconception became the foundation of my message – that God’s Word calls us to care for people and at the same time to stand against injustice, precisely because God is a God of immense compassion and uncompromising moral clarity.  My hour with those friends became a critical force driving my message not only toward sensitivity, but also to a more theological level. 

It is easy to assume that Christians think a certain way.  They probably don’t.  Getting some together to talk about the subject is a simple way to find that out!

Take Seven Steps to a Sermon, No Less

As you know, on the right hand menu of this site I have seven stages of preparation for a sermon.  The order is somewhat significant.  There is a general order there, although aspects of stage 7 – sermon details, could be written at various points in the process.  The number is not significant, I could easily adjust it to nine or more.  However, the number is significant.  Let me explain.

It would be possible to go through the first three stages and then present a message of biblical truth.  Some who espouse “expository preaching” do just this.  By adding in stage 4, purpose, it would be possible to also present biblical demands on peoples’ lives.  Again, some do this and only this.  The final three stages allow you to present biblical truth and biblical demands in a way that is relevant, persuasive and effectively communicated.

Expository preaching, by definition, includes not only accurate interpretation and proclamation of the text, but also effective communication with the listeners present.  To achieve both sides of the equation, all seven stages are necessary in the preparation process.

Who You Preach To – Part Two.

Ramesh Richard presents a helpful angle on the variety of people listening to any sermon. He presents three attitudes that will be present at various times in a message. “An expositional ministry,” he writes, “allows you to put a weekly dent in their apathy, passivity, ignorance, or hostility to equip them for godliness and service.” So the three attitudes that we must be aware of and communicate with?

1. The I Don’t Cares! These are not hostile, they just don’t feel they should be there at all. They are there out of a sense of duty to friends or family, or habitual routine. For this attitude the need raised at the beginning of the message is critical. Without it, they are free to continue their inner stance of not caring.

2. The I Don’t Knows! They lack the background awareness that others may have regarding God, the Bible, Christianity and church life. These people need good biblical content clearly explained.

3. The I Don’t Believes! These people are doubtful about the truth of what is said, or the applicability of it to real life. They are likely to test what is said with questions such as, “Is this truth coherent?” or “Is the sermon consistent?” or “Is this truth practical?” and especially, “Will this work?” For this attitude you must demonstrate a coherent consistency as well as practical applicability.

These attitudes may come and go during the same sermon, sometimes within the same person. Before preaching, evaluate your sermon and adjust its design to overcome the potential pitfalls for these attitudes. Is a clear and valuable need raised? Is there sufficient accessible explanation? Is the message relevant and practical? We preach not to get our study into the public domain, but to see the lives, the hearts, the attitudes of our listeners changed by exposure to God’s Word.

Who Are You Preaching To?

Preaching can be considered a relatively simple equation. You try to get the biblical message to the people sitting in the pews. Yet we so easily give all our effort to one half of that equation. We may study the passage for hours, but give little or no thought to the listeners. So next Sunday, who will you be preaching to? Lewis Smedes looked out at his church one Sunday morning and saw this:

“A man and woman, sitting board-straight, smiling on cue at every piece of funny piety, are hating each other for letting romance in their marriage collapse on a tiring treadmill of tasteless, but always tidy, tedium.

A widow, whispering her Amens to every promise of divine providence, is frightened to death because the unkillable beast of inflation is devouring her savings.

A father, the congregational model of parental firmness, is fuming in the suspicion of his own fatherly failure because he cannot stomach, much less understand, the furious antics of his slightly crazy son.

An attractive young woman in the front pew is absolutely paralyzed, sure she has breast cancer.

A middle-aged fellow who, with his new Mercedes, is an obvious Christian success story, is wondering when he will ever have the guts to tell his boss to take his lousy job and shove it.

A submissive wife of one of the elders is terrified because she is being pushed to face up to her closet alcoholism.

Ordinary people, all of them, and there are a lot more where they came from.”

Lewis Smedes, “Preaching to Ordinary People,” Leadership 4, no.4 (1983): 116.