<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Illustrations &#8211; A Risky Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/11/25/movie-illustrations-a-risky-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/11/25/movie-illustrations-a-risky-business/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Wood</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/11/25/movie-illustrations-a-risky-business/#comment-4675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1694#comment-4675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good thoughts.  

I think much that happens in sermons needs to pass through this kind of filter.  An image shouldn&#039;t just be thrown in just because the church bought a projector.  Any media needs to be well thought out before making an appearance in a sermon.

As to making sure that everyone knows about the movie - sometimes the clip will work without people having seen the movie.  A powerful monologue (e.g. Morpheus from the Matrix: &quot;What is real . . .&quot;) can stand alone without any explanation or context.  

I think it&#039;s important to avoid shifting the focus (as you said so well) - if the clip, picture, quote, etc. takes the focus away from the sermon that&#039;s bad, if it clarifies the sermon, that&#039;s good.

@Jake - that Piper clip gets me angry.  He belittles the work and thought and prayer that go into a sermon that uses video or drama.  I respect him, but on this point I think he&#039;s wrong.  The power of preaching is not tied to the person speaking - it lies in God.  God is not bound by a guy in a suit behind a pulpit - he can preach through any media he chooses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts.  </p>
<p>I think much that happens in sermons needs to pass through this kind of filter.  An image shouldn&#8217;t just be thrown in just because the church bought a projector.  Any media needs to be well thought out before making an appearance in a sermon.</p>
<p>As to making sure that everyone knows about the movie &#8211; sometimes the clip will work without people having seen the movie.  A powerful monologue (e.g. Morpheus from the Matrix: &#8220;What is real . . .&#8221;) can stand alone without any explanation or context.  </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s important to avoid shifting the focus (as you said so well) &#8211; if the clip, picture, quote, etc. takes the focus away from the sermon that&#8217;s bad, if it clarifies the sermon, that&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>@Jake &#8211; that Piper clip gets me angry.  He belittles the work and thought and prayer that go into a sermon that uses video or drama.  I respect him, but on this point I think he&#8217;s wrong.  The power of preaching is not tied to the person speaking &#8211; it lies in God.  God is not bound by a guy in a suit behind a pulpit &#8211; he can preach through any media he chooses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/11/25/movie-illustrations-a-risky-business/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1694#comment-4669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really have to agree with Dr.Piper on this one here is a clip on His take on using movies for illustration, rather insightful: http://www.outofur.com/archives/2009/07/ur_video_john_p.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really have to agree with Dr.Piper on this one here is a clip on His take on using movies for illustration, rather insightful: <a href="http://www.outofur.com/archives/2009/07/ur_video_john_p.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.outofur.com/archives/2009/07/ur_video_john_p.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/11/25/movie-illustrations-a-risky-business/#comment-4662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1694#comment-4662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s an important one:

Don&#039;t give away a major plot twist for a movie that hasn&#039;t been released for very long!  (I&#039;d say a minimum of 2 years.)

I can just see a cool, hip pastor in 1980, about 3 weeks after &quot;The Empire Strikes Back&quot; saying something like, &quot;You know, Josiah wasn&#039;t the only one who had a villainous father.  Luke Skywalker&#039;s father, Darth Vader, was certainly not someone who followed his same path.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an important one:</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t give away a major plot twist for a movie that hasn&#8217;t been released for very long!  (I&#8217;d say a minimum of 2 years.)</p>
<p>I can just see a cool, hip pastor in 1980, about 3 weeks after &#8220;The Empire Strikes Back&#8221; saying something like, &#8220;You know, Josiah wasn&#8217;t the only one who had a villainous father.  Luke Skywalker&#8217;s father, Darth Vader, was certainly not someone who followed his same path.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

