<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-Sermon Specific Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/06/25/non-sermon-specific-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/06/25/non-sermon-specific-feedback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:51:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Pickens</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/06/25/non-sermon-specific-feedback/#comment-3995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Pickens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1355#comment-3995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been reading these posts with some interest.   I agree with Mark, its&#039; not a good idea to rely on the feedback of others from the congregation.  It’s even hard to get good, accurate feedback from others preachers. Given that many preachers struggle in this area, I have very recently begun a ministry which offers preaching/sermon analysis to preachers who want to grow and develop their craft.   Its’ not just feedback on mechanical or structural points (undeveloped points, weak openings, etc),  or even delivery.  I want to help preachers understand their current preaching method and philosophy.  With this discovery, the goal is to then help the preacher adapt to a model which will fit and serve him, his congregation, and the Lord better.  My BA is in Speech Communication from Univ. South Florida and my MDIV is from Southwestern Seminary, with an emphasis in communication.  If you are interested let me know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading these posts with some interest.   I agree with Mark, its&#8217; not a good idea to rely on the feedback of others from the congregation.  It’s even hard to get good, accurate feedback from others preachers. Given that many preachers struggle in this area, I have very recently begun a ministry which offers preaching/sermon analysis to preachers who want to grow and develop their craft.   Its’ not just feedback on mechanical or structural points (undeveloped points, weak openings, etc),  or even delivery.  I want to help preachers understand their current preaching method and philosophy.  With this discovery, the goal is to then help the preacher adapt to a model which will fit and serve him, his congregation, and the Lord better.  My BA is in Speech Communication from Univ. South Florida and my MDIV is from Southwestern Seminary, with an emphasis in communication.  If you are interested let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Zuelch</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/06/25/non-sermon-specific-feedback/#comment-3978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Zuelch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1355#comment-3978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something that sometimes surprises preachers - especially inexperienced preachers - is the comments they&#039;ll get after a worship service.  I remember, in my own preaching days, people coming up to me afterwards and giving me positive comments (and disagreeing, too) regarding points I never made, points I never implied, points that were never in my mind - much less in the text!

I always tried to be as clear as I could be, both in organizing the the sermon and preaching it, but it&#039;s amazing the things people come up with!  Peoples&#039; minds must do a lot of wandering during the service!

I never stopped being amazed at how some folk&#039;s minds worked.  And it always made me more determined to be as clear and organized as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that sometimes surprises preachers &#8211; especially inexperienced preachers &#8211; is the comments they&#8217;ll get after a worship service.  I remember, in my own preaching days, people coming up to me afterwards and giving me positive comments (and disagreeing, too) regarding points I never made, points I never implied, points that were never in my mind &#8211; much less in the text!</p>
<p>I always tried to be as clear as I could be, both in organizing the the sermon and preaching it, but it&#8217;s amazing the things people come up with!  Peoples&#8217; minds must do a lot of wandering during the service!</p>
<p>I never stopped being amazed at how some folk&#8217;s minds worked.  And it always made me more determined to be as clear and organized as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Penrith</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/06/25/non-sermon-specific-feedback/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Penrith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1355#comment-3964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there,

That whole feedback process isn&#039;t that simple.

We&#039;ve implemented something like this with limited success. It&#039;s not easy to find people who will give out criticism (constructive obviously). Most people want to say, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Well done&quot;&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Good job&quot;&lt;/i&gt; and other platitudes rather than &lt;i&gt;&quot;This is what must change!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.

Also you really need consistent feedback not a pat on the back once every three months. In order to get that trick right you really need to have some kind of a system in place.

All in all it&#039;s a useful exercise but not a easy one.

In Christ,

Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>That whole feedback process isn&#8217;t that simple.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve implemented something like this with limited success. It&#8217;s not easy to find people who will give out criticism (constructive obviously). Most people want to say, <i>&#8220;Well done&#8221;</i>, <i>&#8220;Good job&#8221;</i> and other platitudes rather than <i>&#8220;This is what must change!&#8221;</i>.</p>
<p>Also you really need consistent feedback not a pat on the back once every three months. In order to get that trick right you really need to have some kind of a system in place.</p>
<p>All in all it&#8217;s a useful exercise but not a easy one.</p>
<p>In Christ,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles E. Whisnant</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/06/25/non-sermon-specific-feedback/#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles E. Whisnant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1355#comment-3962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get a feed back each week from Charity, that is my wife of 40 years.  If you really want honesty? Don&#039;t ask your wife.

Of course if you want someone to give you feed back on the text itself, you need someone who knows the text.

Audience Analysis, now there is a great tag. I will use this in a post.

Great post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a feed back each week from Charity, that is my wife of 40 years.  If you really want honesty? Don&#8217;t ask your wife.</p>
<p>Of course if you want someone to give you feed back on the text itself, you need someone who knows the text.</p>
<p>Audience Analysis, now there is a great tag. I will use this in a post.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

