<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Bibleworks 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1029#comment-3939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The above is true!  I suppose I should keep the snide remarks to a minimum.  Thanks Sherman, and yes I like Logos too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above is true!  I suppose I should keep the snide remarks to a minimum.  Thanks Sherman, and yes I like Logos too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherman Haywood Cox II</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sherman Haywood Cox II]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1029#comment-3828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank Jordan for bringing this back up,

I think that Bible Works is a lot easier to work with in the text alone.  And I think that price is a big factor.  However, Logos is not merely for preachers who are &quot;lazy&quot; or want &quot;other people&#039;s opinion on the text.&quot;  Logos is a very effective software program that allows for exegesis AND for the study of other people&#039;s work about the text.  

When exegeting a text of scripture, I first read the scripture in one Bible alone.  That can be done with BibleWorks, but it feels more like a book in Logos.  I then read it in multiple versions.  BibleWorks does this pretty well, but Logos has this very neat comparison windown that color codes differences between the versions.  Here we can compare and contrast the differences.  Yes you can do that in BibleWorks, but Logos&#039; view is very nice and compact.  

Logos gets you started on word studies with its exegetical helper report.  

In short, Logos is not simply something for those who do not wish to do solid exegetical work with the text alone.  I do think that BibleWorks is quicker and feels sleeker for text based exegesis, but Logos does have some tools that can aid in that endevor as well.  

It is not as if Logos forces you to even use the commentaries.  You can set up workspaces that allows you to do what you wish to do.  I do think that bibleWorks allows more complex searches in the original languages, but I am not sure about that...

Logos is a bit pricey..and perhaps BibleWorks is cheaper for the materials it gives, but neither program can be called cheap.  If we are looking for inexpensive, then we should be talking about E-Sword or BibleGateway on the web.

at any rate, some people who know the languages choose BibleWorks...and some choose Logos.  Not sure how many choose each, but the question is not who wants to use the languages or who wants to do solid biblical exegesis.  The question is how much of your library do you want on your computer and how much do you want on your shelf.  you probably have a bible dictionary and some commentaries and some other books.  Do you want it in your software in a neatly searchable version, or do you want to leave it on your shelf?  If you want to add a library search to your Bible software then there is really no comparison.  Logos wins hands down.  If you wish to leave much (not all) of your library on the shelf and not have it accessible, then BibleWorks is probably the winner in that case.

Do you want your library in your bible software is the question...Another question is the price you are willing to pay.  But the question is not whether you want to do solid Biblical Exegesis or if you are lazy...The lazy preacher can find reason to be lazy with or without a software program and solid Biblical exegesis can be done in both (assuming that you have the original Bible Languages addon to Logos)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank Jordan for bringing this back up,</p>
<p>I think that Bible Works is a lot easier to work with in the text alone.  And I think that price is a big factor.  However, Logos is not merely for preachers who are &#8220;lazy&#8221; or want &#8220;other people&#8217;s opinion on the text.&#8221;  Logos is a very effective software program that allows for exegesis AND for the study of other people&#8217;s work about the text.  </p>
<p>When exegeting a text of scripture, I first read the scripture in one Bible alone.  That can be done with BibleWorks, but it feels more like a book in Logos.  I then read it in multiple versions.  BibleWorks does this pretty well, but Logos has this very neat comparison windown that color codes differences between the versions.  Here we can compare and contrast the differences.  Yes you can do that in BibleWorks, but Logos&#8217; view is very nice and compact.  </p>
<p>Logos gets you started on word studies with its exegetical helper report.  </p>
<p>In short, Logos is not simply something for those who do not wish to do solid exegetical work with the text alone.  I do think that BibleWorks is quicker and feels sleeker for text based exegesis, but Logos does have some tools that can aid in that endevor as well.  </p>
<p>It is not as if Logos forces you to even use the commentaries.  You can set up workspaces that allows you to do what you wish to do.  I do think that bibleWorks allows more complex searches in the original languages, but I am not sure about that&#8230;</p>
<p>Logos is a bit pricey..and perhaps BibleWorks is cheaper for the materials it gives, but neither program can be called cheap.  If we are looking for inexpensive, then we should be talking about E-Sword or BibleGateway on the web.</p>
<p>at any rate, some people who know the languages choose BibleWorks&#8230;and some choose Logos.  Not sure how many choose each, but the question is not who wants to use the languages or who wants to do solid biblical exegesis.  The question is how much of your library do you want on your computer and how much do you want on your shelf.  you probably have a bible dictionary and some commentaries and some other books.  Do you want it in your software in a neatly searchable version, or do you want to leave it on your shelf?  If you want to add a library search to your Bible software then there is really no comparison.  Logos wins hands down.  If you wish to leave much (not all) of your library on the shelf and not have it accessible, then BibleWorks is probably the winner in that case.</p>
<p>Do you want your library in your bible software is the question&#8230;Another question is the price you are willing to pay.  But the question is not whether you want to do solid Biblical Exegesis or if you are lazy&#8230;The lazy preacher can find reason to be lazy with or without a software program and solid Biblical exegesis can be done in both (assuming that you have the original Bible Languages addon to Logos)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/#comment-3824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1029#comment-3824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bibleworks is awesome!!  I have a base Logos package also, and to get all the resources and tools that I have in Bibleworks I would have had to pay an arm and a leg.  Logos is great for commentaries and has links to things like sermon download sites for lazy Pastors who don&#039;t bother with Biblical exegesis.  I feel that anyone who takes the Bible seriously and wants more than other peoples ideas on the Word should consider Bibleworks first.  Learn original languages (I am still in process) learn exegesis and PREACH THE WORD; 2 Timothy 4:1-4!  Bibleworks will require more work than Logos if you are merely looking for ideas, but for pure Bible study it is far more affordable for what you get and can do with it.  I think Piper who uses Bibleworks would commend it as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bibleworks is awesome!!  I have a base Logos package also, and to get all the resources and tools that I have in Bibleworks I would have had to pay an arm and a leg.  Logos is great for commentaries and has links to things like sermon download sites for lazy Pastors who don&#8217;t bother with Biblical exegesis.  I feel that anyone who takes the Bible seriously and wants more than other peoples ideas on the Word should consider Bibleworks first.  Learn original languages (I am still in process) learn exegesis and PREACH THE WORD; 2 Timothy 4:1-4!  Bibleworks will require more work than Logos if you are merely looking for ideas, but for pure Bible study it is far more affordable for what you get and can do with it.  I think Piper who uses Bibleworks would commend it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc4life</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/#comment-3436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jc4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1029#comment-3436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also try SwordBible at
http://www.swordwarrior.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also try SwordBible at<br />
<a href="http://www.swordwarrior.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.swordwarrior.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastor Jim</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/#comment-3191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pastor Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1029#comment-3191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it&#039;s possible to love software, I love my Logos Gold. Now, if I was only smart enough to take advantage of all the features it offers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s possible to love software, I love my Logos Gold. Now, if I was only smart enough to take advantage of all the features it offers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marston</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Marston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1029#comment-3188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much Peter for your thoughts.  I have Bibleworks 7 and have been contemplating whether I should upgrade to Bibleworks 8.  You just helped me make my choice.  I have found Bibleworks to be indispensable in sermon preparation.  Like you, I do have Logos and love to use Logos for the commentary aspect.  Having both Bibleworks and Logos has greatly increased my joy in preparing sermons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much Peter for your thoughts.  I have Bibleworks 7 and have been contemplating whether I should upgrade to Bibleworks 8.  You just helped me make my choice.  I have found Bibleworks to be indispensable in sermon preparation.  Like you, I do have Logos and love to use Logos for the commentary aspect.  Having both Bibleworks and Logos has greatly increased my joy in preparing sermons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherman Haywood Cox II</title>
		<link>http://biblicalpreaching.net/2009/02/07/review-bibleworks-8/#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sherman Haywood Cox II]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicalpreaching.net/?p=1029#comment-3187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the review.  I am still on the fence as to whether I will upgrade to this latest version.  I am now a version behind on my Libronix scholars and now a version behind on this one.

As for Bible work, I find that I have Bibleworks up and have done my work and closed before libronix even starts up.  When I get ready to preach a sermon, I usually let Libronix find everything related and in the meantime, I start to work in the Bible on Bibleworks...

God bless and thanks for the post...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review.  I am still on the fence as to whether I will upgrade to this latest version.  I am now a version behind on my Libronix scholars and now a version behind on this one.</p>
<p>As for Bible work, I find that I have Bibleworks up and have done my work and closed before libronix even starts up.  When I get ready to preach a sermon, I usually let Libronix find everything related and in the meantime, I start to work in the Bible on Bibleworks&#8230;</p>
<p>God bless and thanks for the post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

